SAP SuccessFactors Learning · Instructional Design

The platform and the training that runs on it, from one consultant.

Most organizations hire two people: someone to configure the LMS, and someone to build the courses that live inside it. The handoff between them is where projects stall. I do both, which means your content is designed for the platform it deploys to, and your platform is configured for the content it has to carry.

See what I do Discuss a project
SuccessFactors Experience
Four full implementations lived through, covering discovery to hypercare
Regulated Environments
FDA and ISO audits with zero training-record findings; all content built to WCAG 2.1 AA and EN 301 549
Global Reach
U.S., Latin America, EMEA and APAC; content localized into all major languages
Risk Coverage
Professional Liability (E&O) insured

Two ways to work together

Pick the track that matches your problem

Clients usually start with one and end up using both. They are scoped separately, so you are never taking on more than the problem requires.

Track One

LMS Implementation Support

You are standing up SAP SuccessFactors Learning, migrating off a legacy platform, or living with a system that was configured badly and never fixed. You want someone experienced on your side of the table.

  • Governance frameworks and configuration standards that survive an audit
  • Independent review and guidance alongside your implementation partner
  • Team augmentation on curriculum, compliance logic and data mapping
  • Mentoring your LMS administrators toward independence
  • Migration guidance onto SuccessFactors from any legacy platform
  • Audit-ready reporting and training-record integrity
Details
Track Two

Instructional Design & eLearning

You need training built: courses that hold attention, survive an audit, and deploy cleanly into whatever platform you already own.

  • Articulate Storyline 360: branching scenarios, simulations, variables and triggers
  • Rise 360 courses with embedded Storyline blocks and video
  • AI-produced presenter and avatar video via HeyGen, Synthesia and ElevenLabs
  • Blended programs across eLearning, ILT, vILT and microlearning
  • Localization into any major language, including Asian markets
  • WCAG 2.1 AA and EN 301 549 accessibility conformance
Details

Why this combination matters

Left unchecked, the gap between content and platform gets expensive

Course design and platform configuration, divided by the seam between them Two areas of work sit either side of a gap labelled the seam, which is where handoffs fail. A single band beneath them spans both, showing one consultant owning each side. Course design What learners must be able to do Platform configuration How the LMS carries and records it The seam One consultant owns both sides
01

Content built blind to the platform

Courses get designed without knowing how the LMS handles completion, versioning or prerequisites. If that surfaces after go-live, the rebuild lands on your budget.

02

Platforms configured without real content

Implementations get signed off against sample data. Structural problems can stay hidden until real curricula, recurring compliance and multi-region assignment hit the system.

03

Nobody owns the seam

When something does not line up, the vendor points at the design team and the design team points at the vendor, while the completion data your auditor asked for still is not right.

I have sat on both sides of that seam, running learning technology inside a global medical device company, and as an independent consultant. When one person owns both, the seam stops being a risk.

Tell me what you are trying to fix

Whether you need a second opinion on an implementation in flight, a team member who has done this before, or a course library that needs rebuilding, send me a message and tell me about it.

Start a Conversation See case studies